GOODTEAK.COM
  
Web GoodTeak

met Google

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

GOODTEAK.COM

SGS RAPPORT
Zoals overgenomen van de website van Floresteca B.V.

SGS-ICS
Gesellschaft für Zertifizierungen m.b.H.
und Umweltgutachter
Raboisen 28
D-20095 Hamburg


Floresteca Agroflorestal Ltda.

Review of the Valuation Model of Teak Plantations - Gross Revenue Before Source Tax


SUMMARY STATEMENT

SGS-ICS Gesellschaft für Zertifizierungen m.b.H. und Umweltgutachter (SGS-ICS), Ham-burg/Germany, was commissioned by Floresteca B.V. (the company) to review the plantation valua-tion model of Floresteca Agroflorestal Ltda. in Mato Grosso State, Brazil.

SGS is the world's leading inspection, verification, testing and certification company. SGS is recognized as the global benchmark for quality and integrity. SGS-ICS is the provider of the Forest Plantation Valuation Service, under which Floresteca's valuation model has been reviewed.

The company is responsible for the design and development of the model, as well as for the data capture, entry and analysis. The task of SGS-ICS was to make a review of the model used for the plantation growth, including field verifications of data; to discuss any observations which may arise and make adjustments or corrections which may be necessary, if any; and to give a clear endorsement on the soundness of the model and the value produced.

The elements of the valuation model reviewed are:

o analyse inventories,

o calculate projections of growth of the Teak trees,

o determine thinning and final harvesting decisions,

o calculate volumes of industrial logs and commercial assortments, and

o calculate future revenues based on the above information and a financial model consisting of price and inflation expectations.

The review carried out by SGS-ICS is based on samples taken in the field (effectively planted area and inventories) and from the computer-based valuation model. Indicators, main variables and market data used by the company were discussed and found to be realistic.

The effectively pfanted area was measured with GPS technology. The methodology as well as the execution of the measurements and analysis of the data was found to be very sound. Results obtained appear to be highly accurate.

The inventory methodology applied consists of Standard practice and procedures of inventories based on permanent sample plots applied in forestry.

The growth model derived from the field data is transparant, comprehensive and provides accurate data on current growth and a realistic projected growth of the plantations on the basis of each individual project.

Projected volumes are based on a volume formula that considers multiple factors including Standard scaling practices in the Teak log market. The projected volumes represent real commercial volumes.

Projected profits and values of standing timber calculated on the basis of the valuation model and assumptions made by the company appear to be realistic and founded on transparant and comprehensive variables.

The results of the Valuation Model are summarized in the report and are included as Annex B. The gross revenue before source taxation is as follows:

Total gross revenue before source taxation

 

Project name
Project code
Year of Planting
Area (HA)
Total gross revenue US $ (rounded)
Gross revenue US$ per ha.
1
Buriti
BUR
1994
592,29
27,858,757
47.036
2
K 8
K 8
1995
331,91
26,407,621
79.563
3
Silas
SIL
1995
582,80
50,141,596
86.036
3
Silas
SIL
1998
21,41
1,454,188
59.573
4
Cocal
COC
1996
374,88
18,921,226
50.473
4
Cocal
COC
1998
133,84
11,903,197
88.936
5
Pimental
PIM
1996
698,26
57,394,960
82.197
6
Tenda
TEN
1996
191,42
9,687,366
50.608
7
Paiolândia
PAI
1997
297,92
26,502,349
88.958
7
Paiolândia
PAI
1998
93,95
8,634,539
91.906
8
Paraiso
PAR
1997
555,05
32,759,676
59.021
9
Bocaina
BOC
1998
431,65
50,722,291
117.508
9
Bocaina
BOC
1999
108,18
14,513,066
134.157
10
São José da Canastra
CAN
1998
44,62
5,810,157
130.214
11
São Judas Tadeu
SJT
1998
26,76
3,052,939
114.086
12
Vale Dourado
VDO
1998
351,68
32,388,510
92.097
12
"
VDO
1999
48,59
6,604,013
135.913
13
Araras
ARA
1999
98,88
5,591,001
56.543
14
Bambu
BAM
1999
549,07
34,977,065
63.702
14
"
BAM
2000
513,83
50,803,750
98.873
15
Capim Branco
CPB
1999
507,87
68,867,341
135.600
16
Casssange
CAS
1999
88,49
8,956,937
101.220
17
Serra das Araras
SER
1999
105,01
5,800,326
55.236
18
Duas Logoas
DLG
2000
1.527,51
171,611,744
112.347
18
"
DLG
2001
2.136,42
212,154,276
99.304
18
"
DLG
2002
48,41
7,305,596
150.911
19
São Miguel
SMG
2001
97,52
14,239,363
146.015
19
"
SMG
2002
5,71
865,473
151.571
20
Barranquinho
BAR
2002
970,2
140,349,311
144.600
20
"
BAR
2003
12,95
2,023,331
156.242
20
"
BAR
2004
1021
166,358,603
162.937
21
Cacimba
CMB
2002
571,08
71,372,380
124.978
21
"
CMB
2003
10,19
1,589,476
155.984
22
Santa Maria do Jauru
SMJ
2002
1.085,18
137,537,755
126.742
22
"
SMJ
2003
207,87
25,701,217
123.641
23
Santa Fe
STF
2003
2.563,74
401,992,345
156.799
24
Icaroma
ICR
2004
837,96
136,534,627
162.937
25
Terra Santa
TST
2004
1.173,09
191,139,680
162.937
Total
19.020,19
2,240,528,048



According to the verifications performed and described in the previous paragraphs, that amount fairly represents the value of the plantation at that date.

Projected values reflect a present high level of monrtoring and maintenance of all plantations.

High priority is given and will further have to be given to marketing of the resulting wood resources.

The valuation includes figures for considerable sale volumes of smaller diameters in 2004 and 2005. The according volumes were mainly used up internally for test purposes, so that realized sales of sawn wood can only be considered as indicators.


Hamburg, 26 May 2006


Guido Fuchs Lead Assessor
Dr. Hans-Joachim Bellmann Lead Assessor
representative of SGS-ICS