|
GOODTEAK.COM
SGS RAPPORT
Zoals overgenomen van de website van Floresteca B.V.
SGS-ICS
Gesellschaft für Zertifizierungen m.b.H.
und Umweltgutachter
Raboisen 28
D-20095 Hamburg
Floresteca Agroflorestal Ltda.
Review
of the Valuation Model of Teak Plantations - Gross Revenue Before
Source Tax
SUMMARY STATEMENT
SGS-ICS Gesellschaft für Zertifizierungen m.b.H. und Umweltgutachter
(SGS-ICS), Ham-burg/Germany, was commissioned by Floresteca
B.V. (the company) to review the plantation valua-tion model
of Floresteca Agroflorestal Ltda. in Mato Grosso State, Brazil.
SGS
is the world's leading inspection, verification, testing and
certification company. SGS is recognized as the global benchmark
for quality and integrity. SGS-ICS is the provider of the Forest
Plantation Valuation Service, under which Floresteca's valuation
model has been reviewed.
The
company is responsible for the design and development of the
model, as well as for the data capture, entry and analysis.
The task of SGS-ICS was to make a review of the model used for
the plantation growth, including field verifications of data;
to discuss any observations which may arise and make adjustments
or corrections which may be necessary, if any; and to give a
clear endorsement on the soundness of the model and the value
produced.
The
elements of the valuation model reviewed are:
o
analyse inventories,
o
calculate projections of growth of the Teak trees,
o
determine thinning and final harvesting decisions,
o
calculate volumes of industrial logs and commercial assortments,
and
o
calculate future revenues based on the above information and
a financial model consisting of price and inflation expectations.
The
review carried out by SGS-ICS is based on samples taken in the
field (effectively planted area and inventories) and from the
computer-based valuation model. Indicators, main variables and
market data used by the company were discussed and found to
be realistic.
The
effectively pfanted area was measured with GPS technology. The
methodology as well as the execution of the measurements and
analysis of the data was found to be very sound. Results obtained
appear to be highly accurate.
The
inventory methodology applied consists of Standard practice
and procedures of inventories based on permanent sample plots
applied in forestry.
The
growth model derived from the field data is transparant, comprehensive
and provides accurate data on current growth and a realistic
projected growth of the plantations on the basis of each individual
project.
Projected
volumes are based on a volume formula that considers multiple
factors including Standard scaling practices in the Teak log
market. The projected volumes represent real commercial volumes.
Projected
profits and values of standing timber calculated on the basis
of the valuation model and assumptions made by the company appear
to be realistic and founded on transparant and comprehensive
variables.
The
results of the Valuation Model are summarized in the report
and are included as Annex B. The gross revenue before source
taxation is as follows:
Total
gross revenue before source taxation
|
Project
name
|
Project
code
|
Year
of Planting
|
Area
(HA)
|
Total
gross revenue US $ (rounded)
|
Gross
revenue US$ per ha.
|
1
|
Buriti
|
BUR
|
1994
|
592,29
|
27,858,757
|
47.036
|
2
|
K
8
|
K
8
|
1995
|
331,91
|
26,407,621
|
79.563
|
3
|
Silas
|
SIL
|
1995
|
582,80
|
50,141,596
|
86.036
|
3
|
Silas
|
SIL
|
1998
|
21,41
|
1,454,188
|
59.573
|
4
|
Cocal
|
COC
|
1996
|
374,88
|
18,921,226
|
50.473
|
4
|
Cocal
|
COC
|
1998
|
133,84
|
11,903,197
|
88.936
|
5
|
Pimental
|
PIM
|
1996
|
698,26
|
57,394,960
|
82.197
|
6
|
Tenda
|
TEN
|
1996
|
191,42
|
9,687,366
|
50.608
|
7
|
Paiolândia
|
PAI
|
1997
|
297,92
|
26,502,349
|
88.958
|
7
|
Paiolândia
|
PAI
|
1998
|
93,95
|
8,634,539
|
91.906
|
8
|
Paraiso
|
PAR
|
1997
|
555,05
|
32,759,676
|
59.021
|
9
|
Bocaina
|
BOC
|
1998
|
431,65
|
50,722,291
|
117.508
|
9
|
Bocaina
|
BOC
|
1999
|
108,18
|
14,513,066
|
134.157
|
10
|
São
José da Canastra
|
CAN
|
1998
|
44,62
|
5,810,157
|
130.214
|
11
|
São
Judas Tadeu
|
SJT
|
1998
|
26,76
|
3,052,939
|
114.086
|
12
|
Vale
Dourado
|
VDO
|
1998
|
351,68
|
32,388,510
|
92.097
|
12
|
"
|
VDO
|
1999
|
48,59
|
6,604,013
|
135.913
|
13
|
Araras
|
ARA
|
1999
|
98,88
|
5,591,001
|
56.543
|
14
|
Bambu
|
BAM
|
1999
|
549,07
|
34,977,065
|
63.702
|
14
|
"
|
BAM
|
2000
|
513,83
|
50,803,750
|
98.873
|
15
|
Capim
Branco
|
CPB
|
1999
|
507,87
|
68,867,341
|
135.600
|
16
|
Casssange
|
CAS
|
1999
|
88,49
|
8,956,937
|
101.220
|
17
|
Serra
das Araras
|
SER
|
1999
|
105,01
|
5,800,326
|
55.236
|
18
|
Duas
Logoas
|
DLG
|
2000
|
1.527,51
|
171,611,744
|
112.347
|
18
|
"
|
DLG
|
2001
|
2.136,42
|
212,154,276
|
99.304
|
18
|
"
|
DLG
|
2002
|
48,41
|
7,305,596
|
150.911
|
19
|
São
Miguel
|
SMG
|
2001
|
97,52
|
14,239,363
|
146.015
|
19
|
"
|
SMG
|
2002
|
5,71
|
865,473
|
151.571
|
20
|
Barranquinho
|
BAR
|
2002
|
970,2
|
140,349,311
|
144.600
|
20
|
"
|
BAR
|
2003
|
12,95
|
2,023,331
|
156.242
|
20
|
"
|
BAR
|
2004
|
1021
|
166,358,603
|
162.937
|
21
|
Cacimba
|
CMB
|
2002
|
571,08
|
71,372,380
|
124.978
|
21
|
"
|
CMB
|
2003
|
10,19
|
1,589,476
|
155.984
|
22
|
Santa
Maria do Jauru
|
SMJ
|
2002
|
1.085,18
|
137,537,755
|
126.742
|
22
|
"
|
SMJ
|
2003
|
207,87
|
25,701,217
|
123.641
|
23
|
Santa
Fe
|
STF
|
2003
|
2.563,74
|
401,992,345
|
156.799
|
24
|
Icaroma
|
ICR
|
2004
|
837,96
|
136,534,627
|
162.937
|
25
|
Terra
Santa
|
TST
|
2004
|
1.173,09
|
191,139,680
|
162.937
|
|
|
|
Total
|
19.020,19
|
2,240,528,048
|
|
According to the verifications performed and described in the
previous paragraphs, that amount fairly represents the value
of the plantation at that date.
Projected
values reflect a present high level of monrtoring and maintenance
of all plantations.
High
priority is given and will further have to be given to marketing
of the resulting wood resources.
The
valuation includes figures for considerable sale volumes of
smaller diameters in 2004 and 2005. The according volumes were
mainly used up internally for test purposes, so that realized
sales of sawn wood can only be considered as indicators.
Hamburg, 26 May 2006
Guido Fuchs Lead Assessor
Dr. Hans-Joachim Bellmann Lead Assessor
representative of SGS-ICS
|